|
Post by ksdtrojan on Oct 21, 2016 7:03:22 GMT -6
Troy scores in final 1:20, beats South Alabama 28-21 "MOBILE — This state football rivalry is only five seasons old, but already Troy and South Alabama have built a compelling addition. The latest unfolded Thursday night when Troy went 80 yards in five plays for a touchdown in the final 90 seconds and held off the Jaguars 28-21 before a crowd of 30,837 at Ladd-Peebles Stadium, the second-largest in South Alabama's eight-year football history...." www.pnj.com/story/sports/2016/10/21/troy-scores-final-120-beats-south-alabama-28-21/92463924/
|
|
|
Post by ksdtrojan on Oct 21, 2016 7:08:00 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by ksdtrojan on Oct 21, 2016 7:12:11 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by ksdtrojan on Oct 21, 2016 7:20:40 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Redwaver on Oct 21, 2016 7:24:04 GMT -6
I want to see the replay that the game review booth official saw that was "indisputable evidence" that Chunn stepped out of bounds on that first play. I haven't seen one yet! That call needs explaining by the league officials!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by ksdtrojan on Oct 21, 2016 7:29:46 GMT -6
Troy defensive front terrorizes South Alabama for 6 sacks in 28-21 victory With top running back Xavier Johnson knocked out of Thursday night's game against Troy in the first quarter due to a head injury, the Jaguars struggled to run the ball consistently in the second half. That led to easy opportunities for a speed-rushing Troy defensive line. The Trojans (6-1, 4-0 Sun Belt) sacked Jaguars quarterback Dallas Davis six times in a 28-21 victory at Ladd-Peebles Stadium in the annual "Battle for the Belt."... www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2016/10/troy_defensive_front_terrorize.html
|
|
|
Post by swordsman on Oct 21, 2016 7:32:56 GMT -6
I agree about the Chunn play stepping out of bounds. There was nothing clear enough that should have overturned it.
Also, ksd I think it was a rib injury and not a head injury to the running back. At least that's what I heard the commentator say.
|
|
|
Post by trojanbrutha on Oct 21, 2016 7:41:58 GMT -6
I want to see the replay that the game review booth official saw that was "indisputable evidence" that Chunn stepped out of bounds on that first play. I haven't seen one yet! That call needs explaining by the league officials!!!!! NB said he stepped out right in front of him in the post-game interview...no harm-no foul.
|
|
|
Post by trojanbrutha on Oct 21, 2016 7:45:32 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by ksdtrojan on Oct 21, 2016 7:49:05 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by ksdtrojan on Oct 21, 2016 7:49:46 GMT -6
I agree about the Chunn play stepping out of bounds. There was nothing clear enough that should have overturned it. Also, ksd I think it was a rib injury and not a head injury to the running back. At least that's what I heard the commentator say. Yeah I heard them say that last night as well.
|
|
|
Post by Redwaver on Oct 21, 2016 8:54:58 GMT -6
I want to see the replay that the game review booth official saw that was "indisputable evidence" that Chunn stepped out of bounds on that first play. I haven't seen one yet! That call needs explaining by the league officials!!!!! NB said he stepped out right in front of him in the post-game interview...no harm-no foul. I'm not disagreeing with whether or not he stepped out and if NB said he did that's good enough for me BUT the rule says "it must be indisputable"! I just never saw that video!
|
|
|
Post by psitech on Oct 21, 2016 9:57:57 GMT -6
NB said he stepped out right in front of him in the post-game interview...no harm-no foul. I'm not disagreeing with whether or not he stepped out and if NB said he did that's good enough for me BUT the rule says "it must be indisputable"! I just never saw that video! This is exactly what I was thinking. I don't care what a coach or player says. There is a rule set in place. There has to be indisputable evidence to overturn a call on the field. Going by what we saw on ESPN there were no camera angles that actually showed Chunn stepping into the white. Was there a different camera angle that we didn't see? That's possible, but it still should be explained.
|
|
|
Post by TrojanFanatic on Oct 21, 2016 10:01:53 GMT -6
ESPN has different camera angles than we do as viewers
|
|
|
Post by Redwaver on Oct 21, 2016 10:39:38 GMT -6
ESPN has different camera angles than we do as viewers We were watching ESPN wasn't we?
|
|
|
Post by TrojanFanatic on Oct 21, 2016 10:47:03 GMT -6
They don't show the ones they have in the booth
|
|
|
Post by ksdtrojan on Oct 21, 2016 14:56:06 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by chattvalleytrojan on Oct 21, 2016 14:58:47 GMT -6
I want to see the replay that the game review booth official saw that was "indisputable evidence" that Chunn stepped out of bounds on that first play. I haven't seen one yet! That call needs explaining by the league officials!!!!! 90% of the calls from last night and the State game need explaining.
|
|
|
Post by trojanbrutha on Oct 22, 2016 13:13:05 GMT -6
NB said he stepped out right in front of him in the post-game interview...no harm-no foul. I'm not disagreeing with whether or not he stepped out and if NB said he did that's good enough for me BUT the rule says "it must be indisputable"! I just never saw that video! If you have access to WatchESPN, you can watch a replay of the game. They replayed it during the broadcast.
|
|
|
Post by Redwaver on Oct 22, 2016 13:19:45 GMT -6
I watched the game live along with every replay which was a field interior side views that never showed "indisputable evidence" his foot was on the line. My understanding is we see the SAME views the official upstairs sees, that he does not have private views that only he sees. I'm not sure what views is on your replay that wasn't on the live broadcast! I'm good with NB's opinion but after that Clemson fiasco I'm fed up with officials using video and getting it wrong or refusing to use it to get it rigjt
|
|
|
Post by trojanbrutha on Oct 22, 2016 13:39:19 GMT -6
I watched the game live along with every replay which was a field interior side views that never showed "indisputable evidence" his foot was on the line. My understanding is we see the SAME views the official upstairs sees, that he does not have private views that only he sees. I'm not sure what views is on your replay that wasn't on the live broadcast! I'm good with NB's opinion but after that Clemson fiasco I'm fed up with officials using video and getting it wrong or refusing to use it to get it rigjt I watched a replay of the live game (rebroadcast) and it looked, to me, like he stepped out as well. Not trying to be disagreeable, but i think they got it right.
|
|
|
Post by Redwaver on Oct 23, 2016 6:10:29 GMT -6
I watched the game live along with every replay which was a field interior side views that never showed "indisputable evidence" his foot was on the line. My understanding is we see the SAME views the official upstairs sees, that he does not have private views that only he sees. I'm not sure what views is on your replay that wasn't on the live broadcast! I'm good with NB's opinion but after that Clemson fiasco I'm fed up with officials using video and getting it wrong or refusing to use it to get it rigjt I watched a replay of the live game (rebroadcast) and it looked, to me, like he stepped out as well. Not trying to be disagreeable, but i think they got it right. Oh, I'm good with your opinion, but your comment makes my point. You said you saw the replay (as did that review official) and you decided, "I THINK they got it right"! On the replay of on field ruling it MUST BE INDISPUTABLE, CLEAR, OBVIOUS and there can be no "I think" it was different than the call on the field and I didn't see anything that came close to that! If his foot had been completely out or CLEARLY well on the sideline I wouldn't have uttered a word. Hey, it's just us sharing thoughts, no problem, no foul.....and we WON anyway.....but had we lost by 6 or less.....!! I just thought for a long time in that game that that was a critical reversal of a huge play that I didn't see how they made.
|
|
|
Post by tenaciousT on Oct 23, 2016 8:16:12 GMT -6
I agree, he may have stepped out and NB was right there and said that he did... BUT according to the rule there must be INDISPUTABLE VIDEO evidence to overturn the ruling on the field that it was a TD. I did not see INDISPUTABLE video evidence that the Chunn stepped out. Yes, he probably did, but probably is not INDISPUTABLE...
The official saw what he thought that the runner may have stepped out, you can see him motion to the line on while the play is going on. BUT there was no video evidence to overturn the ruling on the field. I believe the Ref just didn't want to be the "bad guy" and blow it dead, like he probably should have.
|
|
|
Post by Redwaver on Oct 23, 2016 15:39:07 GMT -6
I agree, he may have stepped out and NB was right there and said that he did... BUT according to the rule there must be INDISPUTABLE VIDEO evidence to overturn the ruling on the field that it was a TD. I did not see INDISPUTABLE video evidence that the Chunn stepped out. Yes, he probably did, but probably is not INDISPUTABLE... The official saw what he thought that the runner may have stepped out, you can see him motion to the line on while the play is going on. BUT there was no video evidence to overturn the ruling on the field. I believe the Ref just didn't want to be the "bad guy" and blow it dead, like he probably should have. Just a curious question, had we lost, would you feel the same about the reversal? It's history and we won but the rule is the rule!
|
|
|
Post by saintflorian on Oct 23, 2016 19:03:05 GMT -6
At this point what does it matter ? We won.
|
|